Mark Dever's "Polity"

The past may be a compass, but should not be an mooring point.  There are many vital lessons to be learned from the past, especially when seeking to understand church structures and approaches.  The past contains a large collection of "lessons learned" which are much better to encounter through observation than experience.

Mark Dever's sizable tome Polity: Biblical Arguments on How to Conduct Church Life is a helpful work in this regard.  In its 586 pages are contained three modern essays (by Dever, Greg Wills and Al Mohler), followed by 10 historically significant Baptist treatises on essential elements of church life.  The earliest of these is by Benjamin Keats and dates back to 1697, while the most recent by William Williams (one wonders what his middle name was) was written in 1874.

It has been hugely helpful to me to step back, outside of our modern approach to church planting and polity, and read what great thinkers of the past have recommended.  A few points have emerged as regular and important themes that contrast with some of our modern expectations or practices, including:

1. Churches were created not through the strenuous solo efforts of a church planting pastor, but when a group of Christians in a local area agreed to come together and commit themselves to being a congregation.  After this, they would call a minister to serve as their pastor.
2. Pastors received their ordination and commissioning directly from their congregation rather than relying on an external ordination body such as a denomination, although there was considerable variation in this area.
3. Closed communion (restricting the Lord's Supper to those who were members and in good standing) was quite common among Baptist churches.
4. Even these biblically-informed men had significant blind spots, including actively dismissing the Scriptural model of a plurality of elders as being a temporary requirement that applied only to the heavily persecuted early church.  A single elder/pastor was the rule in almost all of these churches.
5. Most of these authors were well aware of the tendency of pastors and denominations to extend their authorities beyond biblical bounds, and they established strict limits to fight creeping authoritarianism.

I heartily recommend this book to anyone considering modern day church polity.  There is definitely an admixture of biblical truth and cultural error, but there is much in these documents that is all too rare in our modern churches.  Sift the wheat from the chaff, and even the chaff will encourage you to be humble in evaluating your own positions and reasonings.

And may we all seek with vigour to pursue the Bible's plan for church polity, to the glory of God!

What is "mere church"?

Extract from Richard Baxter's essay where he is the first to use
the phrase "mere Christian"

"Mere Church" is my attempt to work out a review of many of the basics of church life in 21st Century Canada.  

The Bible provides a clear set of principles to guide church life, and a small number of hard rules, and a great degree of liberty in the specifics of what a church is to look like.  This isn't surprising, since the same Scripture is the final authority in all matters of faith and practice for the brand new congregation in the jungle of Papua New Guinea as in the large established churches of downtown Toronto.  Thus in key areas, God's Word tightly defines boundaries and principles, but in most areas of practice there is a broad space for many different methods of organizing the local manifestations of Christ's Body on earth.

I've been involved in many different ways in many different churches, and this blog is my attempt to distill out principles and methodologies that may better serve some churches in Canada than existing, more commonly known approaches.  I don't want to be novel.  I don't want to be reactionary. I don't want to be pragmatic. I want above all to be biblical, and within those boundaries, determine ways to serve the church in Canada.

Let me encourage you, dear reader, to come along with me.  I'm using a blog format to be able to share some ideas with friends, and perhaps engage some other folks in useful dialogue.  And by knowing that some others might possibly read this, it will force me to be diligent and careful in my thinking and expression.

And to clarify, this blog has no relationship to this other Mere Church.